Ok. So, now that he has a real challenger in the primary, what's Stark's reaction?
“Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont, leveled the accusation against fellow Democrat, Dublin councilman and Alameda County prosecutor Eric Swalwell during a candidates' forum sponsored by the League of Women Voters of the Eden Area on Tuesday night at Hayward City Hall.
Stark, 80, said Swalwell, who was elected to the Dublin council in 2010, has taken "hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes" from the Lin family -- among the city's most prominent real estate developers -- in exchange for his votes on zoning issues. "If I were a lawyer, I would call that bribery, but I'm not a lawyer, so I'll let Mr. Swalwell define what he thinks taking all this money from people that he gave special zoning privileges to is. Maybe it's how he sees his role in government."
Swalwell released a statement Wednesday demanding that Stark produce evidence to support the "defamatory" claim within a day, or else issue a public apology. Alex Tourk, Stark's campaign strategist, later Wednesday issued a statement saying Stark "has been personally attacked by Eric Swalwell day in and day out for the past six months while focusing on the job at hand: defending universal health care, protecting Social Security and Medicare and jump starting our nation's economy. This is politics, not a pony ride."
But Tourk didn't return this newspaper's emails and calls Wednesday, Thursday or Friday requesting evidence to support Stark's claims.
Swalwell's 2010 and 2011 economic-interests disclosures showed no income from the Lin family or anyone associated with it. His campaign-finance report for the quarter ending Dec. 31 showed contributions of $2,500 from Mei-Chun Lin of Pleasanton, as well as $2,500 each from Charter Properties President James Tong and his wife, Jennifer, of Fremont. Charter Properties and the Lin family have worked together on Dublin developments.”
-- Mercury News article
So, a 40-year veteran being challenged in a primary immediately leaps to an unsubstantiated accusation of bribery? With no evidence at all? Seriously?
Now I plan on researching more about Swalwell's former statements as well as his history in local politics... however Stark has just done a fantastic job of giving me the benefit of the doubt when it comes to Swalwell.